Kiran Segal, figlia di Zohra Sehgal, ha firmato Zohra Segal - Fatty, biografia della celebre attrice. Fatty è l'affettuoso soprannome scelto da Kiran per la madre, da sempre attenta al proprio peso. Il volume contiene numerose fotografie che ripercorrono la rocambolesca vita di Zohra, ed è stato presentato due giorni fa durante la festa per i suoi primi cento anni. Il cognome Sehgal è stato volutamente modificato in Segal.
29 aprile 2012
Kiran Segal: Zohra Segal - Fatty
Argomenti:
A ZOHRA SEHGAL,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
L SAGGI,
LS KIRAN SEGAL
Rekha e Sachin Tendulkar nel parlamento indiano
Negli ultimi giorni, Rekha e Sachin Tendulkar hanno attirato l'attenzione dei media a causa del loro ingresso nella Rajya Sabha, una delle due camere che compongono il parlamento indiano (l'altra è la Lok Sabha) (*). Come previsto dalla costituzione, dodici membri della Rajya Sabha vengono nominati direttamente dal presidente dell'Unione, su proposta del primo ministro e del ministro degli interni, a riconoscimento dei loro meriti nei campi dell'arte, della letteratura, della scienza e delle attività sociali. Tendulkar, 39 anni, è il primo sportivo a ricevere questo onore. Quanto al cinema hindi, nella RS sono già presenti Javed Akhtar, Jaya Bachchan, Hema Malini e la leggendaria Lata Mangeshkar.
(*) Non mi è chiaro il genere di Rajya Sabha e Lok Sabha. Ho optato per il femminile sperando di non aver commesso un errore.
28 aprile 2012
L'India e la Vespa
La mitica Vespa torna alla conquista del mercato indiano con un modello concepito per il subcontinente. Nel 2012 si prevede una vendita di 50.000 esemplari. Il target di consumatori è quello più elevato, e il prezzo (1.000 euro) è volutamente superiore del 20% a quello dello scooter più caro della concorrenza. Ma un altro articolo della Piaggio ha conseguito in India un clamoroso successo: l'Ape, il tipico taxi urbano locale. Nel 2011 ne sono stati venduti 220.000. L'India e il Sud Est asiatico concorrono al 40% degli attuali ricavi totali del gruppo Piaggio, con la previsione di raggiungere il 50% nel 2014.
Ajay Devgan: Film awards are a sham
L'India è il Paese dei grandi numeri, discorso che vale anche per le cerimonie di assegnazione di premi alla produzione cinematografica. Se escludiamo i prestigiosi National Film Award, risulta difficile districarsi nella giungla di nomination e premiazioni. Alcune star hanno però deciso, ormai da anni, di non partecipare a questo genere di eventi: uno su tutti, Aamir Khan. Lo schivo Ajay Devgan ha rilasciato delle dichiarazioni in proposito, raccolte nell'articolo Film awards are a sham, di Minakshi Saini, pubblicato il 26 aprile 2012 da Hindustan Times. Di seguito un estratto: 'They (the organisers of private awards) need maximum number of stars to attend their ceremony, so they call you up and tell you that if you attend their event, they will give you an award. So what is the point of getting an award only if you will attend the show? And if you are unable to make it at the last minute… the chit with the name of the winner changes and another actor gets the trophy. I have lost faith in such ceremonies'. Capito?
27 aprile 2012
I primi 100 anni di Zohra Sehgal
Zohra Sehgal ha festeggiato oggi a Delhi il suo centesimo compleanno. Tutto lo staff di Cinema Hindi augura con affetto a Zohra altri cento (almeno) di questi giorni! L'attrice è assolutamente adorabile in versione serial killer, in procinto di giustiziare la torta.
Beijing International Film Festival 2012
La seconda edizione del Beijing International Film Festival si svolge a Pechino dal 23 al 28 aprile 2012. In cartellone anche Gattu, di Rajan Khosa.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
FEST 2012,
FEST PECHINO,
R RAJAN KHOSA
26 aprile 2012
Kahaani - Recensione
[Blog ] Recensione di Kahaani (2012) lo splendido thriller che ha fatto impazzire pubblico e critica. Con Vidya Balan e Parambrata Chatterjee. Un film da non perdere!
Raghuram G. Rajan: Terremoti finanziari
A partire dal 27 marzo 2012, è in distribuzione nelle librerie il saggio Terremoti finanziari di Raghuram G. Rajan, pubblicato da Giulio Einaudi Editore. Prefazione di Franco Debenedetti. Nel sito di Einaudi si legge:
'Raghuram Rajan è stato uno dei pochi economisti al mondo ad avvertire la comunità internazionale della crisi imminente prima che si manifestasse, in un momento anzi in cui il paradigma dominante era al suo culmine. In Terremoti finanziari egli mostra come le decisioni individuali che nel complesso hanno causato la crisi finanziaria - decisioni prese dai banchieri, dai governi e dai semplici proprietari di case - erano risposte in sé razionali ma all'interno di un ordine finanziario globale scorretto. Un sistema cioè in cui gli incentivi al rischio erano incredibilmente fuori misura rispetto ai pericoli che tale rischio poneva. Rajan dimostra inoltre come l'accesso disuguale sia all'educazione sia alla tutela della salute negli Stati Uniti ponga noi tutti in grave pericolo; lo stesso si può dire anche per le scelte economiche di Paesi come la Germania, il Giappone e la Cina, che gravano l'America di un fardello non dovuto. A conclusione del libro Rajan delinea le scelte radicali che dobbiamo assolutamente compiere se vogliamo assicurare un'economia globale più stabile al fine di ricreare una prosperità duratura'.
Sempre nel sito di Einaudi si trova una breve presentazione dell'autore: 'Raghuram G. Rajan (1963) insegna Finanza presso la University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Attualmente è consigliere economico del primo ministro dell'India. In passato, inoltre, è stato capo economista del Fondo monetario internazionale. Recentemente è stato segnalato da un'inchiesta dell'«Economist» come «l'economista dalle idee più interessanti per un mondo post-finanziario». Presso Einaudi ha pubblicato (con Luigi Zingales) Salvare il capitalismo dai capitalisti (2004 e 2009) e Terremoti finanziari (2012). Terremoti finanziari ha vinto nel 2010 il «Financial Times» and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award'.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
INIT LIBRI TRADOTTI,
L SAGGI,
LS RAGHURAM G. RAJAN,
V ECONOMIA
22 aprile 2012
Naseeruddin Shah: An extraordinary gentleman
Naseeruddin Shah in Maximum |
Vi segnalo l'intervista concessa da Naseeruddin Shah ad Ali Usman e pubblicata dal quotidiano pachistano The Express Tribune il 15 aprile 2012. Naseeruddin era in Pakistan, precisamente a Lahore, sul set del film Zinda Bhaag, di produzione locale, diretto da Meenu Gaur e Farjad Nabi. La pellicola tratta il tema dell'immigrazione clandestina.
'But given that an actor of his stature has literally hundreds of offers on his table, why choose this movie and this topic? And given that Bollywood constantly beckons him, why opt for a project by a pair of relatively unknown Pakistani filmmakers?
“Illegal immigration is a very big problem both in India and Pakistan. We have young, desperate and unemployed people using different and sometimes very dangerous illegal ways just to go abroad. One Pakistani boy even tried to go abroad while hiding in a plane’s landing gear. While some of them do manage to reach their destination, the majority end up in a terrible position and even lose their lives. (...) The notion that their lives will be somehow better if they manage to get to another country is just a mirage that many educated and unemployed young people are chasing. (...) All these aspects are discussed in the movie. But more than the topic of the film, it was the fact that the script is very interesting that convinced me to work in it.”
But surely there are good scripts in Bollywood as well? Certainly, the lure of Mumbai’s booming film industry inevitably draws Pakistani talent to it like moths to a flame. Why then would Naseeruddin Shah want to work in a Pakistani production?
“I have become quite disillusioned with Indian films. (...) Filmmakers in India have become so complacent that there aren’t any chances of making good films there. Over there, filmmaking is a business and so long as a film makes money it’s a success. If it happens to be a good film as well, then that’s a bonus! I believe that films made today will be watched even a hundred years from now. People will watch them to get a sense of history and see what the art of filmmaking was like. The films being made in India today aren’t what one would want to watch a century later. Of course, there are some young filmmakers trying to opt for quality rather than just profits and I do support them as well.”
How different then is the picture west of the Wagah border?
“I feel there’s more creativity in Pakistan in terms of writing and ideas than there is in India. (...) The poetic and literary gatherings I have attended here are truly amazing! I also find that there’s much more awareness in the youth as well, and that’s why Zinda Bhaag is so relevant to Pakistani society and will resonate with a Pakistani audience. If all these creative people go abroad, who will live here and serve this country?” (...)
“While writing the character of the human trafficking ‘agent’, we really started enjoying getting into the depths and motivations of the character, and very soon, Naseeruddin Shah’s name popped into our minds,” says Meenu [Gaur] who is herself of Indian origin and is a trained filmmaker. “We approached him and thankfully he really liked the character and agreed to work in this film. (...)
Farjad [Nabi] has made a name for himself working largely on documentaries and music videos, all of which have a distinctly ‘artsy’ flavour. Does Zinda Bhaag then fall into the ‘art movie’ category?
“It’s difficult to categories this film as an art or commercial film. All we can say is, this is a film. We don’t even have any ‘heroes’ in it. There are four friends whose stories are integrated and who have equal weightage in it. Even Shah Sahab’s role isn’t the central role,” explain the directorial duo. “We were surrounded by many stories and we just set out to make a film, and by default, we made a film on this subject. It is inspired by the stories of real boys and real girls”.'
Argomenti:
A NASEERUDDIN SHAH,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE PACHISTANO,
F THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE,
R FARJAD NABI,
R MEENU GAUR,
V INTERVISTE
The Music Project
The Music Project è un'encomiabile iniziativa organizzata da Tehelka. La scena musicale indipendente indiana è pressoché sconosciuta: escludendo la classica, musica in India significa principalmente colonne sonore cinematografiche. È quindi una gradita sorpresa visionare i numerosi filmati caricati da più di un anno da Tehelka nel suo canale YouTube ufficiale: ecco la playlist. Nella presentazione si legge: 'The Music Project is a series of video portraits, documenting independent music in the country. The idea is small, intimate, and features a host of artists from a range of genres, aiming to capture a distinctly spontaneous flavor that reveals itself in single takes and live environments. To take musicians outside of studio spaces and to record wholly raw, acoustic, unplugged sounds'. Non mi resta che augurarvi buon ascolto.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
F TEHELKA,
M INDIPENDENTE,
M PLAYLIST,
V VIDEO
17 aprile 2012
Pranayam - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Pranayam (2011), film malayalam diretto da Blessy con Mohanlal, Anupam Kher e Jaya Prada.
Argomenti:
A MOHANLAL,
AU CATERINA,
CINE MALAYALAM,
R BLESSY,
RECENSIONI
13 aprile 2012
Shah Rukh Khan a Yale
1.600 persone hanno assistito all'incontro con Shah Rukh Khan organizzato ieri dall'università di Yale. L'attore ha interagito con gli studenti, ha accennato qualche passo di danza coinvolgendo anche i docenti, e sembra aver dimenticato la sgradevole avventura del nuovo fermo in un aeroporto americano (la superstar è stata bloccata dalle autorità per accertamenti, e rilasciata dopo un paio d'ore, grazie all'intervento dei responsabili di Yale). A proposito di quest'ultimo episodio, il Re ha spiritosamente commentato: 'Whenever I start feeling too arrogant about myself I always take a trip to America. The immigration guys kicked the star out of stardom. They (immigration officials) always ask me how tall I am and I always lie and say 5 feet 10 inches. Next time I am going to get more adventurous. (If they ask me) What colour are you, I am going to say white'. Video e photo gallery della conferenza.
Aggiornamento del 14 aprile 2012: Shah Rukh Khan questioned at US airport again, Chidanand Rajghatta, Indrani Bagchi, Bharati Dubey, The Times of India. Nell'articolo si ricorda che l'attore era già stato fermato in aeroporto nel 2009, e che la stessa sorte è toccata in passato a Kabir Khan, Sajid Khan, Irrfan Khan, e persino ad Abdul Kalam (ex presidente dell'Unione Indiana), per non parlare di Ted Kennedy. Irrfan ha dichiarato: 'America is the most advanced country in the world. Do they really have such a flawed security system that the name of a person keeps popping each time he lands at the airport? I have been detained at US airports not just once but at least four times and for two to three hours. One cannot even make a phone call to the studio, though they have a car waiting outside the airport to pick you up'.
Argomenti:
A IRRFAN KHAN,
A SHAH RUKH KHAN,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
F THE TIMES OF INDIA,
V PHOTO GALLERY,
V UNIVERSITÀ,
V VIDEO
12 aprile 2012
Vettai - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Vettai (2012), avvincente film d'azione in lingua tamil con Arya, R.Madhavan, Amala Paul e Sameera Reddy.
Argomenti:
A ARYA,
A R. MADHAVAN,
AU CATERINA,
CINE TAMIL,
R N. LINGUSAMY,
RECENSIONI
9 aprile 2012
Reelworld Film Festival 2012
Il Reelworld Film Festival 2012 si svolgerà a Toronto dall'11 al 15 aprile. Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu chiuderà la manifestazione, alla presenza del regista Shakun Batra. In cartellone un'altra pellicola indiana, The forest (2012), di Ashvin Kumar.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
FEST 2012,
FEST TORONTO REELWORLD,
R ASHVIN KUMAR,
R SHAKUN BATRA
Bollywood filmmakers take 3D head on
Hindustan Times, nell'articolo Bollywood filmmakers take 3D head on pubblicato il 7 aprile 2012, fotografa lo stato attuale della diffusione della tecnologia 3D nell'industria cinematografica di Mumbai, riportando le dichiarazioni di registi, produttori e distributori. Budget a parte, pare che la difficoltà principale stia nel blindare le superstar per un periodo contrattuale più lungo, dal momento che realizzare pellicole in questa tecnologia richiede un tempo maggiore. Da qui la preferenza, sino ad ora, di convertire i film in 3D, e non di girarli direttamente in 3D.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
F HINDUSTAN TIMES,
V STORIA CINEMA INDIANO
8 aprile 2012
The shocking truth about star prices!
Ficchiamo il naso nelle tasche delle star bollywoodiane: quanto guadagnano? Meritano i loro lauti compensi? Gli introiti derivano solo dal cinema? Si riscontrano differenze nelle remunerazioni corrisposte ad attori e ad attrici? Le cifre sono da capogiro. I produttori battono strade nuove per assicurarsi profitti, gli attori si trasformano in produttori, i registi e i compositori entrano nell'arena.
The shocking truth about star prices!, Komal Nahta, Brunch, 7 aprile 2012:
'Kareena Kapoor would have to act in eight films to earn what Salman Khan can pocket in just one film, which is around Rs 23-27 crore! [1 crore = 10.000.000] Akshay Kumar, the star of the multi-star cast Housefull and Housefull 2, has not seen the housefull boards outside cinema halls for his solo starrers since what seems to be forever, but he still gets paid Rs 18-20 crore for every film he works in. Vidya Balan may have carried Kahaani to the winning post and bagged every award for The Dirty Picture, but would you believe that even after two hits, she is not the highest paid actress in Bollywood? That’s the dirty truth about star prices. Till the ’90s, Amitabh Bachchan was the only star paid in crores. Figuratively speaking, stars are supposed to be living up there in the sky. But now, it is their prices that are touching the sky. Welcome then to the real world of stars and their unreal prices. You may even feel inclined to term their remunerations obscene, more vulgar than any adult sex film Bollywood has ever churned out.
Rules of engagement
Star prices are rarely, if ever, fixed, because actors make concessions for producers or directors who are friends or who are star names themselves. Stars are also emotional people. So you have Shah Rukh Khan doing films for Yash Chopra and Karan Johar at a price which is lower than what he would demand from other banners. Salman had, years ago, gone out of his way to accommodate a film with the down-and-out Saawan Kumar Tak when the latter requested him to make his film with lesser actors saleable with his presence. Besides, if a script catches the fancy of a star or if he is keen to work with a director or producer, he doesn’t mind making a concession in his fees because, after all, stars need good scripts, banners and directors as much as producers and directors need top stars.
Like any other product, the price of a star is determined by the laws of demand and supply. The greater the demand and/or lower the supply (read availability of stars), the higher the price. If the entire family of lead stars is considered as one unit and all the producers put together, another, it is clearly a case of demand for stars exceeding the supply. That’s because the number of films produced each year in Bollywood is around 140-150 but the saleable heroes or those who can be cast in lead roles are barely 14 or 15. Ditto for the leading ladies. On an average, therefore, each star should be working in 10 films every year, which doesn’t happen now. Ultra-selective heroes like Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh do one or two films whereas other A-listers like Salman and Akshay are seen in two, three or four films every year. There may be actors who have six to eight releases a year but they are very few in number.
That our actors, especially the A-list ones, command obscenely high prices is an open secret. Not just in absolute terms, even if one were to look at the ratio of flops to hits (80:20) every year, it is anybody’s guess that most of our stars get undeservedly high prices. For, even if a good script is the main reason why a film works at the ticket windows, the stars have a major role to play, especially the hero and heroine who work as magnets to draw the audience to the cinemas, initially at least. Considering that 80 per cent of the films bomb every year and 90 per cent don’t even open decently enough to justify the high prices paid to their lead actors, it is clear that most of our stars are paid remuneration that is far more than they deserve.
Box office magnets
Even today, it is on the strength of face value that the paying public patronises a film, at least for the first couple of days. In that sense, more than even the scriptwriter, director and producer, it is the star, especially the hero, who, in a manner of speaking, is the ISI mark for a film. In other words, when a star is asking for Rs 10, 15, or 20 crore for a film, he is, by implication, assuring his producer of a great opening. But for the audience, his presence in a film is like a promise of quality cinema or, at least, value for their money. It is due to this faith which the audience has in a star (that the star will offer them an entertaining movie) that the latter commands the price he does. Or, only that actor should actually be considered worth every crore he is paid, who ensures that his film opens to bumper houses and also ensures that it offers entertainment to the paying public. So, Aamir, Salman and Shah Rukh seem to be the only three stars who are being paid what they deserve. Ajay Devgn and Hrithik Roshan are inching their way to that position but the occasional Guzaarish or Aakrosh pulls them down.
Bang for the buck?
Akshay’s 20-crore price tag is wrong because his solo films just aren’t working at the box-office; Sunny Deol, Shahid Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan may deliver an occasional success but they’ve also given huge duds, which means they lack the consistency of Aamir, Shah Rukh and Salman. However, the fees the stars charge don’t vary according to the fate of their films - the pay packet is not cut if a film flops. But Aamir Khan is a class apart. From charging a fee and a percentage in profits, Aamir now keeps a share in the profits his starrers make. "That way, I am not burdening the film’s budget with my cost, and I am also ready to put my neck on the line," says Aamir matter-of-factly. "By not taking anything upfront and only charging a fee for acting if the film makes a profit, I am openly stating that if the audience doesn’t like my film, I don’t deserve a penny."
The Indian obsession with a male child manifests itself in film viewing habits too. That explains why hero-oriented films open far better than heroine-oriented ones. Women-oriented films like No One Killed Jessica and Kahaani started slowly and scored only afterwards. The Dirty Picture, for all its claim of being a woman-centric story, still boasted of three heroes, hit music and titillating fare! Kareena Kapoor, the heroine of Heroine, has been paid a reported fee of R4 crore but she won’t be entitled to even one per cent of the profits in the film. By the way, Sridevi was the only actress who nearly touched the one-crore mark in the Nineties. The leading lady (...) had, years ago, signed a film for Rs 1 crore but that film never got made.
Character actors rank even lower than heroines in the pay hierarchy. But over the years, supporting actors have started charging exorbitantly. So you have Irrfan getting Rs 1.5 crore and Paresh Rawal insisting on a fee with seven zeros or, at least, Rs 75-80 lakh [1 lakh = 100.000].
(1) All figures are approximate.
(2) Rates/fees are never fixed. Adjustments/concessions are almost always made.
(3) Aamir Khan charges the maximum fee among all the stars, for endorsements.
(4) Shah Rukh Khan probably earns more every year by way of endorsement fees than for acting in films. He endorses about a dozen brands but works in one or two films a year.
(5) Shah Rukh has always maintained that he wouldn’t mind over-charging for endorsements and stage shows but would prefer under-charging film producers because he owes his stardom to films and film producers.
(6) Salman Khan is not as popular for brand endorsements as compared to the size of his superstardom because of his court cases.
(7) Till about four years ago Saif Ali Khan used to endorse the highest number of brands but he has since cut down on the number of products he sells.
(8) For performing on stage at televised events (like awards functions), stars get paid almost the same amount they charge per day for endorsements. For non-televised events, the payment is about 50-60% of the endorsement fee per day.
Top Draws
The cool club of Bollywood’s Khan Crorepatis almost always ensures a spectacular opening at the box office.
Salman Khan: Acting fee per film 23-27cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 1.5cr.
Aamir Khan: Acting fee per film (share in profit, could go up to) 40cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 4cr.
Shah Rukh Khan: Acting fee per film 20-25cr (including share in profit) - Endorsement fee (per day) 2-3cr.
Stars’ big bucks come from:
Movies
Guest Appearances
Endorsements
Stage shows
Hosting stage shows
Hosting TV shows
Attendance at weddings/functions
Judging reality TV shows
Dancing/performing at events.
The only appearance for which stars, thankfully, don’t charge money are those made at funerals of friends, acquaintances and respected industry people.
Big players
Actresses lag behind the men when it comes to money.
Katrina Kaif: Acting fee per film 3-4cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 1-1.25cr.
Kareena Kapoor: Acting fee per film 3-4cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 1-1.25cr.
Vidya Balan: Acting fee per film 2.5-3cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 0.25-0.5cr.
Priyanka Chopra: Acting fee per film 2-3 cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 0.65-0.75 cr.
Deepika Padukone: Acting fee per film 1-2.5 cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 0.5-0.75 cr.
Anushka Sharma: Acting fee per film 1-1.5 cr - Endorsement fee (per day) 0.25-0.4 cr.
Colour of producers’ money
With the remuneration of actors, actresses and technicians soaring, how does a producer still end up making profits? Well, it’s not really tough because business has also grown manifold in the last 10 years. The main reasons for the growth are the high ticket prices in cinemas and the ever-growing sources of revenue, particularly sale of satellite rights. The desperation of corporate houses is another reason why producers of star-cast films are not generally in the red.
Since most corporate houses have to show turnover to shareholders, they assign projects without weighing the pros and cons. As it is, they have deep pockets due to the availability of public money and institutional funding. Since they fund star-studded films, the producers of those films could end up laughing all the way to the bank even if the corporates incur losses due to high costs. And frankly, even corporates don’t incur losses in their books of account because most of them amortise only 50 per cent of the cost of a film in the first year. This amounts to accounting jugglery but that’s the way it is.
This is not to say that these costs have not had an adverse effect on the viability of projects. Many of Akshay Kumar’s films would not be termed flops if his price were to be a third of what it is. And if that had to happen, most of his producers who have been making losses, would end up making profits.
Enter, the actor-producer
Not satisfied with earning handsomely as actors, many of our leading men have turned producers. Right from Shah Rukh, Aamir and Salman to Akshay, Ajay Devgn, Sunny, Anil, Amitabh, Saif, Sanjay Dutt and John Abraham, every actor worth his name and probably unworthy of his crores has jumped on to the production bandwagon. When the success ratio of films is barely 20 per cent and when it is the producer who suffers losses if a film flops, why would stars turn to such a risky business? It is because of three reasons:
(i) Of the 20 per cent films which click every year, 75-85 per cent are star-studded fares and so, it makes sense for stars to produce films with themselves acting in them.
(ii) It is a fallacy to think that it is the producer who bears the brunt of the losses when a film bombs at the box-office. If a film is pre-sold to distributors or a corporate house, the producer can make a profit even if the film fails at the ticket windows as, in such cases, the loss would be the corporate’s or borne by the distributors. Examples of producers making money while corporates or distributors incurred heavy losses are aplenty. Omkara, Guzaarish, Tees Maar Khan, Kites are some.
(iii) With theatrical earnings being only one part of the revenue stream of a film, a star-producer can make gains even if his film doesn’t fare well at the turnstiles, by pre-selling satellite, audio and other rights.
This is not to say that star-producers never make losses. Of course, they do. Saif Ali Khan, nicknamed Travel Agent Vinod after the many countries his character in his home production, Agent Vinod, travels to, will end up burning his fingers and toes in the thriller. Had Saif only acted in it, there was no question of him losing money. But in most cases, star-producers end up making profits because star-studded films have better chances of clicking with the public and also because star-struck corporate houses are willing to fund films of star-producers and take the risk of distributing them.
Interestingly, stars never brag about their earnings the way film producers do by announcing the gross and net collections of their released films on huge hoardings and newspaper advertisements. Therefore, in an industry where stars and their chartered accountants are the only ones who know their exact income, the grapevine and industry talk are the only sources of information about star earnings, star prices etc. But these are tried and tested reference points.
Specalists’ fees
Directors’ Cut
With star prices touching the sky, directors also started demanding fat salaries at the turn of the new century. Highly-paid directors include Raj Kumar Hirani, Rohit Shetty, Anees Bazmee, Farah Khan, Imtiaz Ali, Rajkumar Santoshi, Prabhu Deva, Sajid Khan and the like. Of these, top ones like Hirani ask for a share in profits so that their fee could go up to R20 crore per film, or more! Some of the other above-named directors charge between R3 crore and R10 crore per film. Yash Chopra, Aditya Chopra, Karan Johar, Rakesh Roshan and Sooraj Barjatya could be among the highest paid filmmakers of Bollywood but if they aren’t, it is because they only direct films for their own banners, not for outsiders. Years ago, when there was a crazy boom in production, Anees Bazmee was rumoured to have signed a film for a business house for R20 crore, besides a share in profits! Of course, the film never got made because the boom did not last.
Bring on the money: it’s in the script
Years back, writing duo Salim-Javed’s names used to adorn the hoardings of films after they gave hits such as Zanjeer, Yaadon Ki Baaraat and Haath Ki Safai, all in one year (1973). Almost 40 years later, the tribe of writers felt short-changed. But things are changing for the better. So impressed was Aamir Khan with the script of Talaash when he heard it that he decided to pay 3 per cent of the profit of Talaash to Reema Kagti as her fee for direction and 2 per cent of the profits as remuneration to Reema and Zoya for penning the script. It is anybody’s guess that the 2 per cent in the case of Talaash will work out to at least Rs 1 crore i.e. Rs 50 lakh to Reema and Zoya each. This, as against the earlier decided fee of Rs 5 lakh each. If it was Salim-Javed who made the industry realise the importance of writers, it’s now Kagti and Javed’s daughter, Zoya, who’ve brought their contribution into focus once again.
Ruling the charts, note for note
Not just stars but technicians have also hiked their rates over the last decade. Among composers, only A.R. Rahman gets paid as a percentage of the price his music gets sold for. That way, he gets around Rs 2-4 crore per film. Other composers charge between Rs 30 and Rs 60 lakh. The way it works for a top music composer is this: he charges around Rs 10-20 lakh per song; if there are six songs, he gets paid Rs 60 lakh to Rs 1.2 crore. After paying off the expenses of recording, including fees of singers, lyricists, charges of the recording room etc., the composer is generally left with Rs 30-60 lakh. Among lyricists, Javed Akhtar is perhaps the highest paid (Rs 3 lakh per song), followed by Gulzar (Rs 2 lakh). Other renowned song writers charge anything ranging from Rs 10,000 to Rs 50,000 per song.
Even action directors, who were paid moderately, nowadays demand Rs 30-40 lakh per film. If the action scenes are too many and too stylish, the action master’s pay packet could even go up to Rs 75 lakh.
Small screen, big bucks
Star TV Show Payment/episode:
Salman Khan Dus Ka Dum Rs 1-1.25 cr.
Shah Rukh Khan Kaun Banega Crorepati Rs 1.0 cr.
Amitabh Bachchan Kaun Banega Crorepati Rs 0.75-1 cr.
Hrithik Roshan Just Dance Rs 0.75-0.8 cr.
Akshay Kumar Khatron Ke Khiladi, Master Chef Rs 0.7-0.8 cr.
Priyanka Chopra Khatron Ke Khiladi Rs 0.3-0.4 cr.
Madhuri Dixit Jhalak Dikhla Ja Rs 0.1-0.2 cr.
Farah Khan, Rohit Shetty for judging TV shows Rs 0.1-0.2 cr'.
Argomenti:
A AAMIR KHAN,
A AMITABH BACHCHAN,
A SALMAN KHAN,
A SHAH RUKH KHAN,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
F BRUNCH,
V STORIA CINEMA INDIANO
5 aprile 2012
Ram Charan : Southscope Aprile 2012
L'affascinante cavaliere impavido di Magadheera sovrasta la copertina del numero di aprile di Southscope, l'attore è attualmente impegnato nella promozione del suo nuovo film Racha (che il titolo sia un'unione delle prime sillabe del suo nome.. RAm CHAran?) action movie commerciale sullo stile dei successi di Mahesh Babu e NTRjr. I numerosi trailer circolanti in rete promettono al pubblico ampie dosi di musica e intrattenimento.
4 aprile 2012
London Paris New York - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di London Paris New York (2012), commedia romantica con Ali Zafar e Aditi Rao Hydari.
3 aprile 2012
Katy Perry in India
L'India intera esulta: è stata ufficialmente inaugurata la quinta stagione dell'Indian Premier League di cricket. Alla cerimonia, svoltasi a Chennai, si è esibita anche Katy Perry.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
M INTERNAZIONALE,
V EVENTI,
V SPORT
2 aprile 2012
Mira Nair: I must say I am full of masala
Vi segnalo l'intervista concessa da Mira Nair a Richa Bhatia, e pubblicata oggi da The Times of India. La regista rivela qualche dettaglio circa la trasposizione cinematografica di Shantaram:
''Is your film, Shantaram, shelved?
Shantaram didn’t happen. It’s really sad, because everything was sorted out. But when we had completed shooting for a month, the Hollywood Writer’s Guild in America went on strike, demanding more writers in the business. The slogan of that strike that went on for 100 days, was ‘All pencils down’, which means you can’t write a single word. Johnny Depp, the producer of Shantaram, owns the rights of the film, couldn’t wait for three months. It was a film worth making, but sadly, it didn’t happen'.
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)