La seconda edizione del Pramana Asian Film Festival si è svolta a Reggio Calabria dal 5 al 7 aprile 2023. In cartellone Manikbabur Megh (bengali, titolo internazionale The Cloud & the Man) di Abhinandan Banerjee. Gaganachari, pellicola malayalam di fantascienza di Arun Chandu, ha conquistato il premio per il miglior film.
Visualizzazione post con etichetta CINE MALAYALAM. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta CINE MALAYALAM. Mostra tutti i post
9 aprile 2023
Pramana Asian Film Festival 2023
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE BENGALI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
FEST 2023,
FEST REGGIO CALABRIA,
INIT FESTIVAL,
POST MALAYALAM,
R ABHINANDAN BANERJEE,
R ARUN CHANDU,
V FANTASCIENZA
7 settembre 2021
Mammootty: The discreet masculine charm
La superstar del cinema malayalam Mammootty compie oggi 70 anni. Per celebrare l'evento, Film Companion pubblica un lungo articolo nel quale ripercorre la carriera dell'attore. Mammootty - The discreet masculine charm, C.S. Venkiteswaran:
'The variety of roles he has essayed, the diverse acting modes and speech styles he has experimented with, and the untiring efforts he puts into each role, are phenomenal to say the least. (...) A rare and unique combination of magnetic personality, physical charm, longevity of career, diversity of roles and ever-increasing popularity - all make Mammootty one of the greatest actors in Indian cinema. (...)
He entered the scene when major actors of the earlier era were at the fag end of their careers. (...) This was the scene when both Mammootty and Mohanlal entered it in the early 80's. But it was the decade when the Malayalam film industry was witnessing a huge jump in terms of production: from around 80 films a year in the previous decade it rose to more than 110, averaging about 2 new releases every week! It was also a period when gulf remittance to Kerala was on the rise, spurring film production and the growth of exhibition halls. In terms of content, treatment and themes too, this decade proved to be very prolific: films of all kinds - 'art', 'middle' and 'commercial' - and genres - suspense thrillers, family dramas, northern ballads, socials, films based on contemporary events and politics etc. - were being made. All this created a vibrant industry atmosphere that encouraged experimentation with daring themes, introduction of new techniques and technologies, and the entry of more and more new talents: scenarists, directors and technicians, as well as producers. (...) Entering the scene at such a high point in Malayalam film industry, a hardworking actor like Mammootty had ample opportunities to hone his skills, connect with the audience, and to entrench himself as a star in the industry and as an actor in popular imagination. In his first decade itself, Mammootty had the opportunity to work with all the important filmmakers from different generations, and in diverse categories and genres. (...) So much so that in the very first decade of his entry, he had acted in more than 200 films in all conceivable genres - socials, family dramas, mystery thrillers, ghost stories, period films, art films, and also some light comedies. By the end of the decade, he had established himself as a very dependable and successful star with an acting style of his own.
Even in the 1990s when the entry of television rocked the film industry by capturing its most favourite and popular thematic terrains, and hitting the box office by bringing visual entertainment to the audiences' homes, the popularity and stardom of Mammootty continued to grow. Actually, in the case of both Mammootty and Mohanlal the coming of television was a blessing in disguise. Though television captured the most important segment of the movie market - the 'family audience', as far as its entertainment content was concerned, it predominantly depended on cinema for its films, songs, comedy scenes, clips and the umpteen parodies based on that. (...) The burgeoning popularity of Mammootty as an actor and his pre-eminence within the industry are evident from the fact that he acted in as many as 220 films in the 1980's. From 1983 to 1986, he acted in about 35 films every year! In the next decades, along with the general decline in film production, Mammootty films also came down to an average of around 55 films a year. It was also a period when production, turnover and also the number of theatres were on the wane. If the 1990s saw a more mature Mammootty performing with greater ease and in a variety of roles, in the post-millennium years his persona has assumed greater gravitas and grace. A host of young 'newgen' actors were entering the field in the last decades, and superstars like Mammootty and Mohanlal becoming more selective in their choice of roles and films, and so, figuring mostly in mega productions. But even in the so-called 'newgen' films one can see the glare and shadows of these super stars - in the form of references, tributes, jokes, imitations or parodies. (...)
Evolution of an actor
(...) In most of the films, (...) one can see both these character-types and role models - that of the protector of the weak and women, and as the enforcer of Law - being elaborated in various guises, diverse situations and different milieus. (...) In many of the (...) films in the 80's, Mammootty plays the role of the family man who is caught in domestic and marital conflicts of different kinds (...) strengthening Mammootty's fan base among the female audience. (...) Soon, too many films of the same genre led to a series of box office failures. (...) By the end of 1980s and the beginning of 1990s, we see the actor persona of Mammootty strongly leaning towards hyper-masculine roles, with a slew of commercially successful and thematically engaging films. (...) These films expanded and placed Mammootty on to a wider canvas of narratives that portrayed different and more complex shades of masculine power and conflicts. Compared to earlier films, the narrative world of these macho protagonists expanded from the realm of the individual and the family, to that of society and nation at large, and the paternal/protector figure turned into an authority figure representing the State. These narratives traversed history and legends, and were animated by various shades of desire, valor, love and troubling questions about corruption in public life and crime. These varied roles successfully combined Mammootty's stature as an actor and appeal as a star. What distinguished Mammootty the actor was his continuing engagements with films outside the commercial-mainstream that constantly enriched and expanded his repertoire, and brought him critical acclaim and national accolades. (...) Though not very comfortable in his comic roles, Mammootty also experimented with light comedies. (...) Another feature that distinguishes Mammootty is his ability to embody and voice 'regionalities'. There are several hit films where he plays the role of a hero belonging to a particular locality/region/milieu, and speaks the respective local lingo. (...) While elevating him as a versatile actor, these roles also indicate the pan-Kerala image that he has built up through his career. (...)
Mammootty-Mohanlal duo and the Ambivalence of Malayalee Masculinity
It is impossible to talk about Mammootty and his acting career without referring to Mohanlal, the other super star, his friend, competitor and his alter ego. (...) One, the upright, powerful, masculine and monogamous family man, and the other the playful, eternal flirt and boy next door, vulnerable, polygamous, lyrical and romantic. While one readily sings and dances around trees, the other is averse to it. (...) Such strange equivalence could be read as the expression of the ambivalence in Malayalee male masculinity - one that is torn between the macho and the tender, the masculine and the feminine, the strong and the vulnerable, the rigid and the flexible, the tragic and the comic. Incapable of making any final choice between the two, Malayalee masculine imagination seems to waver between the two, consciously and subconsciously, and indulges in the possibilities and diverse pleasures they open up through these star-duo. (...) As a lone, masculine hero, age and aging go much more comfortably or convincingly with Mammootty whereas with Mohanlal it often looks odd or a little forced, for we always associate him with youthhood, playfulness, and often childlikeness. (...) While Mammootty roles are more often associated with seats of power and authority, (...) Mohanlal plays the common man, the one who is in search of security, life, freedom and love. (...) While the concern of one is to control and conquer the world, the other explores and revels in all its uncertainties and accidents. So, while one offers love and invites our identification, we are in awe of the other and look up to him in admiration. While one is a companion and fellow prankster, the other is a protector or guide. (...)
The Star Persona
(...) In the last decades, stories about loss of masculinity itself becomes a theme in some films. (...) Interestingly, they all tangentially tap on to the Mammootty persona deeply embedded in public minds to poignant effect. So through time, Mammootty persona has not only embodied and enacted masculine charm, power, desires and fantasies, but also its fears, anxieties and uncertainties. Another makeover domain was visible in the new millennium, when Mammootty played several light and comic roles. (...) The incisive self-criticism he expresses in many of his acclaimed interviews prove his commitment to the art and also his relentless effort to reinvent himself. This is also a unique feature that elevates him from other actors of his generation, who tend to get pigeon-holed into certain stereotypes, industry models or generic patterns. As an actor and a star, Mammootty had always tried to transgress these boundaries and to redefine and remake himself. Which is what has always kept him at the top, for so long and for so many'.
Argomenti:
A MAMMOOTTY,
A MOHANLAL,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
F FILM COMPANION,
V STORIA CINEMA INDIANO
30 marzo 2021
What early Indian sci-fi looked like
Vi segnalo l'articolo Videochats on the Moon, immortality pills: what early Indian sci-fi looked like, di Gayle Sequeira e Ashutosh Mohan, pubblicato da Film Companion il 27 marzo 2021:
'More than meets the eye: early films about invisibility
Most of Bollywood's first few sci-fi outings revolved around the limitless potential that invisibility could unlock for a single person, and the unintended consequences that could follow. Nanabhai Bhatt's Mr. X (1957), considered to be the first Indian science-fiction film, follows a lab assistant who accidentally drinks an invisibility potion. Bad news: there's no antidote that will make him reappear. When there's a spate of crimes in the city, he's the obvious suspect and must prove his innocence. In Mr. X in Bombay (1964), the protagonist gets his hands on an invisibility potion and uses it to solve a problem more pressing than world hunger - his lack of a love life. (...) In 1965 film Aadhi Raat Ke Baad (...) director Nanabhai Bhatt (...) attempts to answer one question: how much harder would it be to solve a murder mystery if the main suspect could turn invisible at will? (...) It's a plot similar to Bhatt's earlier vanishing man film Mr. X. These early films adopted a myopic attitude towards invisibility, with the protagonists often using their newfound powers for selfish reasons rather than the greater good. It took till 1971 for invisibility to serve more altruistic purposes. In K. Ramanlal's Elaan. (...) Mr. India (1987), [is] the first mainstream Bollywood sci-fi film. (...) Another film (...) explored the more nefarious consequences of scientific advancement. In Mr. X [1984], written and directed by Khwaja Ahmad Abbas. (...) In Malayalam film Jaithra Yaathra (1987) (...) invisibility is used to create chaos and for comic ends. (...) Invisibility, unlike immortality, appears to excite no moral questions. A person who lives forever can probably cause a lot of harm, but how bad can a brief disappearance be?
A whole new world: sci-fi set in space
Director A. Kasilingam's Kalai Arasi (1963) has aliens from another galaxy visit Earth and Mohan (M.G. Ramachandran) follow them back to their home. They look like us except for their sartorial preferences. They like tight shorts and safari helmets. Their spaceship has a distinct steampunk sensibility - levers and crankshafts everywhere. You even hear the periodic puff of escaping steam that apparently powers its cross-galaxy travel. (...) There is, however, one fundamental difference between us and them: the aliens are lovers of art to a fault. They've come to abduct talented artists from Earth and make them better ones. Their spaceship has a tiny screen that's a precursor to Google Earth. (...) What's surprising, especially since this is the first science-fiction film in Tamil, is how people react to a UFO. Mohan is with his friends when a spaceship flies overhead. He practically yawns an explanation, saying that experts believe that aliens from other galaxies would visit Earth at some point in time. His blasé friends are instantly convinced, feeling as much awe upon seeing a spaceship as an odd-looking cow. (...) Hindi film Chand Par Chadayee (1967) released two years before the first manned mission to the Moon, which is perhaps what emboldened director T.P. Sundaram to take creative liberties with the subject. (...) For a film that includes ridiculous scenes such as (...) parachute-wearing Moon women dancing above the clouds, the film was astonishingly prescient in terms of technological advancements. A high-ranking Moon citizen and the king of Mars videochat, and even communicate through a Google Glass-like device in which a real-time video of the caller appears on the lens of a pair of sunglasses. (...) The same year as Chand Par Chadayee's release, Martians visited Earth in Nisar Ahmad Ansari's Wahan Ke Log. (...)
Caution, side effects: medical science-fiction
Just as the vastness of space can be liberating, so can the invention of certain drugs that give their users powers. In P. Subramaniam's Malayalam classic Karutha Rathrikal (1967), the soft-spoken Santhan (Madhu) invents a drug that changes his appearance and gives him the ability to kill people. He's unable to make an antidote (perhaps, because of impure ingredients) which leads to his own death. An adaptation of R.L. Stevenson's Strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, KR has an ambivalent stance towards the morality of science. We don't actually see much science, except in a comedy track that explains the concept of an antidote. The idea of an antidote becomes extraordinarily important in this subgenre, in which a scientist (typically out of hubris) invents a drug that gives him superpowers. In Naalai Manithan (1989) [tamil] the fate of the world hangs on Dr. Shankar (Jaishankar). After winning the Nobel Prize for inventing an AIDS drug, he creates another one that wakes the dead. Shankar's hubris prevents him from acknowledging the side effects of his immortality pill: violent and anti-social behaviour. Just as in Karutha Rathrikal, a scientist's individual choices shape how science plays out. By taking moral responsibility for his out-of-control inventions, the scientist ends up as the villain in these films. Both Santhan from KR and Shankar from NM die as a result of pushing the limits of human potential. This, however, isn't the case for the Professor (Anant Nag) from Kannada film Hollywood (2002), which claims to be India's first robot film. If the Professor's humanoid robot US-47 goes rogue, it's the robots fault, not his. (...) The Professor simply dismantles the malfunctioning robot. A rogue invention is only a technical problem, not a moral one. The film doesn't ask, like Naalai Manithan does, whether science leads to progress. Why embargo an invention when you could simply dismantle if it's not useful? Not quite human, not quite machine is the vehicle at the center of Ajantrik (1958), considered to be one of the earliest Bengali sci-fi movies. Director Ritwik Ghatak explores the relationship between a small-town driver, Bimal (Kali Banerjee) and his battered taxi by humanizing the vehicle through a combination of visual and sound effects. (...) Is the taxi sentient, or is Bimal projecting his emotions onto it?
Back to the future: films about time travel
In Aditya 369 [1991, telugu], written and directed by Singeetam Srinivasa Rao, Professor Ramdas (Tinnu Anand) (...) invents a time machine. (...) What's interesting is when he [Nandamuri Balakrishna's Krisha Kumar] ends up in an apocalyptic-looking 2504 AD. We see a post-World War 3 Earth, where a radiation from nuclear weapons has made the surface unfit for living. It's practically a desert, and humans live underground in hermetic forts. (...) 'Stomach computers' tell people when to eat. But (...) this isn't interpreted cynically. (...) People in 2504 AD are merely amused that their lives are run by machines.
Science fiction is still an underserved genre in our films. Films like Rahul Sadasivan's Red Rain (2013) [malayalam] explore the instinctive terror we feel for something from beyond Earth, but recent films have continued earlier templates, with a bit more realism. Arati Kadav's Cargo (2019), Tik Tik Tik (2018) [tamil] and Antariksham 9000KMPH (2018) [telugu] are space operas but the science is believable. Fifty years after Karutha Rathrikal, Maayavan (2017) [tamil] explores the question of who we really are if we swap brains with someone else. 24 (2016) [tamil] and Indru Netru Naalai (2015) [tamil] are entertaining time travel films that take us to the past and, hesitantly, to the future of science fiction films'.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE BENGALI,
CINE KANNADA,
CINE MALAYALAM,
CINE TAMIL,
CINE TELUGU,
F FILM COMPANION,
R A.KASILINGAM,
R SINGEETAM S. RAO,
R T.P. SUNDARAM,
V FANTASCIENZA,
V STORIA CINEMA INDIANO
8 luglio 2020
Fahadh Faasil: Make your directors fall in love with you
Vi segnalo l'intervista concessa dal talentuosissimo Fahadh Faasil ad Anupama Chopra e a Baradwaj Rangan, pubblicata ieri da Film Companion. Make your directors fall in love with you; you'll never run out of content: Fahadh Faasil:
'AC: It has taken us eight months to get you here.
I think it's because I feel incomplete about my films. I don't know when the right time to talk about them is. I usually talk about them only after a year when I have actually realised what I tried to do and what I achieved. When we start shooting I think, 'Is this how it is supposed to be?', 'Is this right?' or 'Is this how it is in the script?'. And after release, I'm thinking 'Did I get it right?' I always go through that cycle in my head for all my films and that's why I'm always absent from promotions.
AC: You just shot See you soon with Mahesh Narayanan. And you mentioned that this is not a feature film and it is kind of an experiment.
I met Mahesh 10 years ago when I moved to Kochi. When we eventually decided to do Take off, we knew it wasn't the first film we wanted to do together. But I had to be there for him. That is how Take off, and then Malik happened and then we decided to do an even bigger film and then the lockdown happened. Then, he came up with this idea that we can eventually redesign a film on the editing table. He said he needed three actors who need not be together, it could happen over phone and video and things like that. I thought it was crazy but I did a test shoot for a day and told him to capture the portions with the other actors. (...) When he came back with a rough edit, I knew I wanted to be part of the film. I told him to not worry about the theatrical release or money and to just shoot it.
BR: When Irrfan Khan passed away, you wrote a deeply moving note where you said 'I owe my acting career to him. I don't think I would have come this far in my career had I not picked up that DVD and watched that film'. Which DVD was it and what time in your life were you in when you watched that film and how did it help your acting?
It's a film directed by Naseeruddin Shah called Yun Hota Toh Kya Hota. I saw it in 2005 and it was my third year in America. That was the first time I saw Irrfan on screen and he didn't look like an actor to me. I couldn't stop looking at him, even when other actors came on screen. He looked so graceful. I kept looking at his feet to check whether his feet were on the floor, he seemed to be always floating. No one has made that kind of an impression on me. (...)
AC: In the few interviews you have given, you've mentioned that you don't prep for a role. What is the Fahadh Faasil process? (...)
I think my prep is to costantly interact with my writer and director and DOP on the sets. I never finish my films on schedule because, for me, the filming process takes a lot of time. (...) The prep I do is that I keep interacting. I never stop questioning. (...) I might have a one-liner. Most of the time, we have the climax. We know this is how we want to conclude (...) and that changes like five days into the shoot. I think the drive to shoot is to achieve what we initially thought or the fire we had for the initial idea. So, once we capture that, then that's when things start growing. It's difficult but it is very interesting and I love it. (...) I rarely walk in to sets prepared. The moment I have to prepare, I think I will collapse. When I work in Tamil, the biggest problem is that I don't think in Tamil. I go there and read the script and then translate it into my language and then learn the lines. That process is not easy for me. I want to do a Tamil or Hindi film and speak in Malayalam (laughs).
AC: Is it true that when you shot Take off with Parvathy, you asked her how her character's signature would be? How does a detail like that affect what you are doing? (...)
What fascinated me was that after she read the script, she was talking like Sameera, thinking like Sameera, and we were on sets and I was not able to get it right. So, I tried talking to her and at that time she was fiddling with a pen and then I told her to just sign Sameera, and the way she signed was very vulnerable. (...) Something about it looked vulnerable to me and that is where I picked it from. (...) These are actually very small things that nobody really notices. (...)
AC: Is it true that you take two days to get into character and you request your director to reshoot the first two days later?
Yeah. My first two days are exercise. I never get them right. (...) All my films we have actually gone back and shot the first two days. (...)
AC: Is acting stressful for you or do you find joy in it? And, how do you deal with films that don't do well?
I believe I have become a better human being once I started acting and started taking it seriously, because that is when I started thinking about others. When a film goes wrong, what actually goes wrong is your thought process and what you have been thinking for the last two or three years. (...) That is very difficult to accept for me. I actually get into a defensive mode and I try to explain, 'This is what I tried'. (...) Because I was wrong, the film went wrong and I usually accept that. But that phase is very difficult for me. I usually take time to come out of it. I come out of it when I find something else to be excited about.
BR: [Thiagarajan] Kumararaja said that you knew only three Tamil words and he was completely amazed that you did the dubbing for the film with all emotions intact. He spoke about it as if he had almost sighted a UFO. How do you do that, especially in a language you don't know?
I have to give it to Kumar. I was very sceptical about it. I wanted to do a film with Kumar, but I wanted it to be in Malayalam, to be honest. I actually went to Kumar five years ago, even before he started thinking about Super Deluxe, and told him 'Let's do a film in Malayalam', and I got him all the way to Kochi, but it didn't work out and he went back to Chennai. Then, he called me for Super Deluxe. I was very sceptical, because if you do this film with a person who can think and speak in Tamil, you can do wonders with the character, so I kept pushing him to do it with another actor, but he was adamant and kept saying that it was just language. One thing I realised when I was doing the film is that I started speaking in Tamil. If I spend time there, I'll get used to the language, that is what I realised. The thing about Tamil is that it is a very beautiful language and to learn it by rote is very easy. It's like learning a song. (...)
AC: Which role took the most out of you?
All the roles. (...) It is amazing to get people to react to your emotions or smile at you. And I discovered this much later in my life. I was not ready to be an actor or anything, and I am a person who tasted success much too late in my career and once I tasted it, the entire connection became very beautiful. So, for me, it is very important to feel for the character and the story. I need to believe that this is something that could happen or that has happened and I need to feel the connection to that story or plot.
BR: Your father launched you, things didn't work out, you took a break of eight years and came back. What was your frame of mind at that point?
After my first film didn't do well and I decided to go to the US, I had this conversation with my father. My father introduced Mohanlal. So when I spoke to him, he told me that I have an acting rhythm and that if I was actually planning to take up acting, I should do it in a way that it is happening from my stomach and not from my brain, and that was a very interesting advice. It is about how you see things and how you want to see things. So, I want to feel for the character and then emote. (...) I turned 19 during the shoot. To be honest, if that film had worked, I don't think I would have come this far. I would have been a star for 10 years and then I don't know what would have happened. Because the film didn't work, at least I am trying to be an actor, and that makes a huge difference.
AC: Fahadh, I loved the fact that Nazriya [Nazim, moglie di Fahadh] proposed to you on the sets of Bangalore Days. Please tell us that story.
Yeah, there is another side to it, but okay (laughs). It was new for me to see a girl that wasn't excited about meeting Fahadh Faasil. I had to do things to get her attention and I think I fell in love with that. I would walk into sets and the first thing I would want to see is if she was looking at me. So, I took initiative but she asked me out because she knew that I didn't have the guts to ask her. The two good things that I did after coming into cinema is getting married to an actress and starting a production house. (...)
AC: Now that you have gone to Tamil, would you be interested in Hindi, perhaps?
For me, the fact that my Malayalam films are watched in Mumbai, and that I get these messages and beautiful calls from people in the same industry is itself a big thing. (...) None of my films are made into any other language, because they are very rooted. My cinema is here. I would love to interact with Meghna Gulzar and Zoya Akhtar. There are so many brilliant directors that I'd love to work with, and there are so many films that are so good. If you ask me, Piku was the best film to have released in the last decade. I absolutely love it, the performances and the way it is made. (...)
BR: Speaking of Kumararaja, did he actually make you do 200 takes?
That's his average. With me, it has gone to 500-550 shots and what is interesting is I know I would have done around 60-65 takes for him and he would come and say that 'In the 17th take the look was perfect but in the 12th take, I liked the rendering, but as a whole I liked the 35th take'.'
Argomenti:
A FAHADH FAASIL,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
CINE TAMIL,
F FILM COMPANION,
R MAHESH NARAYANAN,
R THIAGARAJAN KUMARARAJA,
V INTERVISTE
12 ottobre 2019
Asiatica Film Festival 2019
La ventesima edizione di Asiatica Film Festival si è svolta a Roma dal primo al 10 ottobre 2019. Biriyaani, film in lingua malayalam diretto da Sajin Baabu, ha vinto il premio NETPAC con la seguente motivazione: 'Per l'ambiziosa rappresentazione delle problematiche sociali, religiose e politiche dell'India, narrate attraverso lo sguardo e il cuore di una donna che intraprende un viaggio dalla miseria ad un'intima illuminazione'.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
FEST 2019,
FEST ROMA ASIATICA,
INIT FESTIVAL,
R SAJIN BAABU
4 ottobre 2019
Vincenzo Bocciarelli nel cast del film Professor Dinkan
Vi segnalo l'intervista concessa dall'attore Vincenzo Bocciarelli a Mariagloria Fontana, pubblicata oggi da Affari Italiani. Bocciarelli dichiara di essere stato scritturato per il film in lingua malayalam Professor Dinkan, diretto da Ramachandra Babu: 'Sono stato scelto fra migliaia di attori in tutto il mondo per girare una saga, Professor Dinkan 3D, prima abbiamo girato a Bangkok, qualche settimana fa, poi andremo in India, è una produzione indiana, Dileep è il protagonista, il più grande attore indiano. È un’esperienza straordinaria per me'.
Aggiornamento del 7 novembre 2023: la realizzazione di PD era stata in precedenza funestata dai noti guai giudiziari di Dileep. La pellicola non è stata ultimata a causa del decesso del regista avvenuto nel dicembre 2019. Sembra che la produzione stia provvedendo al completamento del progetto al fine di una possibile distribuzione nel 2024.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
F AFFARI ITALIANI,
INIT ATTORI ITALIANI,
INIT MEDIA,
R RAMACHANDRA BABU,
V INTERVISTE
21 settembre 2019
Malayalam Cinema: Frames of Small Things
Vi segnalo l'articolo Malayalam Cinema: Frames of Small Things, di Divya Unny, dedicato alla recente evoluzione del cinema in lingua malayalam e pubblicato ieri da Open:
'Syam Pushkaran, the writer of Kumbalangi Nights says, “There has been a very conscious attempt to look at the kind of stories we need as a society, and the lives of real people around us. A film like Kumbalangi Nights that speaks of insecurities within a family, selflessness among strangers, a kind of fearlessness in new love, brings to the fore those stories. When we show a man’s vulnerabilities or strip his ego down on screen, we are not trying to defame a gender or a person, but asking if we need to take a hard look at ourselves and our conditioning.” (...)
With homegrown stories told in the most visually intriguing fashion, these films are so local that they are global. You can see, smell and taste Kerala in them. Coconuts being scraped, banana leaves being chopped, fresh tapioca getting fried, pork being sold, fishnets being laid out, paddy being farmed - from foods to festivities, nuns and nurses, from toddy and tea shops, to buses and motor boats, from pointless strikes to churches and mikes, the filmmakers proudly evoke their state’s culture as a backdrop for their stories. (...)
You begin to empathise, answer questions, and marvel at the irony of life thanks to everyday characters within these films who are neither black nor white, but just human. (...)
With OTT platforms these films can now reach a far wider audience thanks to the subtitles. (...)
For many, the evolution of Malayalam cinema is categorised broadly as the pre and post Chemmeen (1965) era. The film on the lives of rural fisher folk in Kerala and social prejudices against them was an adaptation of the award-winning novel by the legendary author Thakazhi Sivasankara Pillai, and became a cinematic benchmark. (...)
For those who have grown up on Malayalam cinema, there’s never been a lack of realism and stark humour. Priyadarshan’s films especially of the 80s and 90s painted the common man in unusual ways. Actors like Mohanlal became the face of that common man. However, it can’t be denied that much of commercial Malayalam cinema till recently was driven by the male protagonist, and his transformational powers. Both Mohanlal and Mammootty were flagbearers of this power for over four decades, and that’s now changing. The ‘Lalettan’ and ‘Mamokka’ (how the actors are lovingly referred) monopoly is slowly fading, spelling the end of an era in Malayalam films. (...)
All the characters are so well fleshed out, one can never predict where the story will lead. (...) Almost dissolving the very idea of a ‘protagonist’ in a film, and thereby setting a new foundation for cinema. No character is on a moral high-ground and you almost feel like you know them'.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
F OPEN,
V STORIA CINEMA INDIANO
16 settembre 2019
Chola a Milano
Chola verrà proiettato a Milano, all'Eliseo Multisala, il 25 settembre 2019 alle ore 18.30, nell'ambito della manifestazione Le Vie del Cinema.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
INIT EVENTI,
R SANAL K. SASIDHARAN
19 febbraio 2014
Berlin International Film Festival 2014
![]() |
Da destra: Imtiaz Ali, Alia Bhatt e Randeep Hooda |
Il Berlin International Film Festival 2014 si è svolto dal 6 al 16 febbraio. Come da tradizione, molti i titoli indiani in cartellone, fra i quali segnalo:
* Killa, di Avinash Arun, in lingua marathi, vincitore dell'Orso di cristallo per il miglior film nella sezione Generation Kplus;
* Papilio Buddha, sezione Panorama, di Jayan Cherian, in lingua malayalam. Trailer. PB tratta il controverso tema delle discriminazioni e violenze di cui sono vittime gli intoccabili e le donne, e la sceneggiatura si ispira a fatti realmente accaduti. PB ha subito clamorose pressioni da parte della censura indiana. Il regista ha respinto quasi tutte le richieste avanzate dall'organo governativo di censura, e la proiezione della pellicola è stata negata persino nei festival cinematografici. Nel marzo 2013 aveva però beneficiato di una magra distribuzione in alcune selezionate sale in Kerala;
* Highway, sezione Panorama Special, di Imtiaz Ali, con Randeep Hooda e Alia Bhatt, colonna sonora di A.R. Rahman. L'area del sito della Berlinale dedicata a Highway offre il video della conferenza stampa, nonché alcune succose fotografie. E quando si tratta del fascinoso Randeep Hooda c'è da lustrarsi gli occhi.
Vedi anche Randeep Hooda: I did not talk to Alia for the longest time, 9 marzo 2014
![]() |
Randeep Hooda (ritratto ufficiale) |
Da destra: I. Ali, A.R. Rahman, A. Bhatt e R. Hooda |
Argomenti:
A ALIA BHATT,
A RANDEEP HOODA,
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
CINE MARATHI,
FEST 2014,
FEST BERLINO,
MC A.R. RAHMAN,
POST 2013,
POST MALAYALAM,
R AVINASH ARUN,
R IMTIAZ ALI,
R JAYAN CHERIAN,
V TRAILER
16 dicembre 2013
Orissa : Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Orissa, film drammatico in lingua malayalam uscito nel 2013. Diretto da M. Padhmakumar con Unni Mukundan e la debuttante Sanika Nambiar.
Argomenti:
AU CATERINA,
CINE MALAYALAM,
R M. PADMAKUMAR,
RECENSIONI
14 settembre 2013
Celluloid : Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Celluloid, film biografico diretto da Kamal basato sulla biografia di JC Daniel il primo regista del Cinema Malayalam. Con Prithviraj, Mamta Mohandas e la debuttante Chandni.
Argomenti:
A PRITHVIRAJ,
AU CATERINA,
CINE MALAYALAM,
R KAMAL,
RECENSIONI
4 giugno 2012
Bollywood su Rai Movie: ciclo 2012
Da domani 5 giugno e sino al 4 settembre 2012, ogni martedì sera alle ore 21.00 Rai Movie proporrà un film hindi. Si parte con Kuch Naa Kaho (Un padre per mio figlio). Fra gli altri titoli: Aap Ki Khatir (Un fidanzato in affitto) il 12 giugno, Swades (Una luce dal passato) il 19 giugno, Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic (Un pizzico d'amore e di magia) il 26 giugno, Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (Non dire mai addio) il 3 luglio. In programma anche Jodhaa Akbar (La sposa dell'imperatore) e Nanhe Jaisalmer (È tempo di sognare). Preciso che sono tutti titoli proposti da Rai 1 negli ultimi quattro anni. In prima visione sono in programma Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi (Un incontro voluto dal cielo) e Guru. Vi segnalo inoltre Nirakazhcha (La strada dei colori), in lingua malayalam, di Anish J. Karrinad, con Vincenzo Bocciarelli; nonché La maga delle spezie, produzione internazionale con Aishwarya Rai. Vi ricordo che lo scorso febbraio e lo scorso marzo Rai 4 aveva sorprendentemente presentato - in versione direi integrale - il mitico Dabangg.
Vedi anche:
- Bollywood: 100 di questi anni, 8 giugno 2013, ciclo 2013 su Rai 1 e su Rai Movie.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE INTERNAZIONALE,
CINE MALAYALAM,
F RAI,
INIT ATTORI ITALIANI,
INIT FILM DOPPIATI,
INIT TELEVISIONE,
R ABHINAV KASHYAP,
R ADITYA CHOPRA,
R ANISH J. KARRINAD,
R MANI RATNAM
22 maggio 2012
Vadakkumnadhan - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Vadakkumnadhan, complesso dramma psicologico in lingua malayalam interpretato dalla superstar Mohanlal, nel cast anche Padmapriya e Kavya Madhavan.
9 maggio 2012
Seattle International Film Festival 2012
Il Seattle International Film Festival 2012 si svolgerà dal 17 maggio al 10 giugno. Fra i titoli indiani in cartellone, vi segnalo Adaminte Makan Abu e Valley of Saints.
Argomenti:
AU CINEMA HINDI,
CINE KASHMIRI,
CINE MALAYALAM,
FEST 2012,
FEST SEATTLE,
R MUSA SYEED,
R SALIM AHMED
8 maggio 2012
Vandhanam / Nirnayam : Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Vandhanam (1989) e del suo remake telugu Nirnayam (1991). Con Mohanlal, Nagarjuna, Amala e Girija Shettar. Regia di Priyadarshan.
17 aprile 2012
Pranayam - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Pranayam (2011), film malayalam diretto da Blessy con Mohanlal, Anupam Kher e Jaya Prada.
Argomenti:
A MOHANLAL,
AU CATERINA,
CINE MALAYALAM,
R BLESSY,
RECENSIONI
8 marzo 2012
City of God - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di City of God, interessante film in lingua malayalam dalla narrativa a incastro. Protagonisti Prithviraj, Rima Kallingal, Parvathi Menon, Indrajit e Swetha Menon.
17 febbraio 2012
Cocktail - Recensione
[Blog] Recensione di Cocktail (2010), thriller malayalam con Anoop Menon, Samvurtha Sunil e Jayasurya.
29 gennaio 2012
Film malayalam 2011 consigliati da Caterina
[Blog] Classifica personale dei migliori film malayalam distribuiti nel 2011.
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)